Failure to comply with the requirements may have serious consequences:
Potentially invalid board decisions
A board of directors not composed in accordance with requirements of the law is in principle not a validly elected board. A non-valid board of directors does not have the authority to represent the company externally nor take legal action on behalf of the company, and does not have the authority to bind the company to agreements and obligations. Thus, board of directors not composed in accordance with requirements of the law (taking into account rules on supplementary elections) should not make any decision on behalf of the enterprise until a new board of directors with a compliant composition is elected.
Breach of the gender requirements may have serious consequences for third parties having entered into agreements with the company which have been decided at board level of the company, as such agreements are, as a main rule, not validly entered into by the company. Whether lack of authority entails a lack of contractual obligation on the company, is a question of so-called legitimisation effect. The rule is that agreements and transactions made by company representatives who have exceeded their authority are not binding on the company if (i) the company proves that the counterparty realised or should have realised that authority was exceeded, and (ii) it would be contrary to honesty to enforce the transaction.
Failing to register in the Norwegian Register of Business Enterprises
Applications for registration in the Norwegian Register of Business Enterprises will be refused if they are not legal. Thus, an enterprise will not be able to file for registration an elected board of directors that does not fulfil the gender balance requirements.
Compulsory dissolution
Finally, an enterprise that does not comply with the requirements face serious consequences: it will be compulsorily liquidated by ruling of the court. There are no exceptions to the compulsory dissolution rule, nor is it possible for enterprises to apply for exemption from the new gender balance requirements. Enterprises therefore have no other choice than to fulfil the requirements.
Given that the gender balance requirements only apply to boards with three or more directors, we do not expect to see many cases of compulsory dissolution. Rather, we assume that enterprises who for various reasons are unable or unwilling to fulfil the requirements will merely reduce the number of board directors rather than risking compulsory dissolution.